<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Document Assembly (and Case Management)</title>
    <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php</link>
    <description>Document Assembly (and Case Management) Blog is sponsored by Basha Systems LLC</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>sgr@bashasys.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-03-12T23:18:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Wordle Revisited</title>
      <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php/weblog/wordle_revisited/</link>
      <description>Apparently my experiment with Wordle did not change the results for HotDocs, XpressDocs, GhostFill, Time Matters, Amicus Attorney, and AdvologixPM. Perhaps, if I reorder the phrases HotDocs, XpressDocs, GhostFill, Time Matters, Amicus Attorney, and AdvologixPM so that they are alphabetical:&amp;nbsp; AdvologixPM, Amicus Attorney, DealBuilder, GhostFill, HotDocs, HoudiniESQ, Time Matters, XpressDocs.&amp;nbsp; Maybe if they are reverse alphabetical:&amp;nbsp; XpressDocs, Time Matters, HoudiniESQ, HotDocs, GhostFill, DealBuilder, Amicus Attorney, AdvologixPM, it will push me over. Alternatively, I can try them by word length:&amp;nbsp; Amicus Attorney,  Time Matters,  AdvologixPM, HoudiniESQ,  GhostFill and HotDocs.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Document Assembly, GhostFill, HotDocs, Time Matters</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So ... back to Wordle for the test.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-03-12T22:18:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Wordle and Cloud Maps</title>
      <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php/weblog/wordle_and_cloud_maps/</link>
      <description>I recently WORDLED this blog.&amp;nbsp; It turned out the hot word was SAAS.&amp;nbsp; Even though our predominant focus is document assembly and workflow, those words did not show up.&amp;nbsp; HotDocs,  XpressDocs, GhostFill, Time Matters, Amicus Attorney, and AdvologixPM did NOT show up. There was some mention of ContractExpress and DealBuilder.&amp;nbsp; This could be because Wordle focuses on the RSS feed which is the Summary para of the blog entry, and not the body.&amp;nbsp; It also could reflect that HotDocs, XpressDocs, GhostFill, Time Matters, Amicus Attorney, and AdvologixPM don&#8217;t have prominent mention in the summary. And so if I use the words: HotDocs, XpressDocs, GhostFill, Time Matters, Amicus Attorney, and AdvologixPM more often in my summaries, then it is likely that HotDocs, XpressDocs, GhostFill, Time Matters, Amicus Attorney, and AdvologixPM may show up more often.&amp;nbsp; And so I am testing Wordle to see how responsive it is for these words: HotDocs, XpressDocs, GhostFill, Time Matters, Amicus Attorney, and AdvologixPM.</description>
      <dc:subject>Collaboration, Document Assembly, HotDocs, Time Matters</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies for the redundancy, but I am checking an experiment.&nbsp; This is also an advise to those using social media to pay special attention to Summary/Abstracts if they are targeting key words.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-03-12T22:07:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Place to Go for News on Document Assembly and Case Management</title>
      <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php/weblog/the_place_to_go_for_news_on_document_assembly_and_case_management/</link>
      <description>It&#8217;s live!!!! The new Basha Systems legal technology news site.  Come for a visit.&amp;nbsp; For TOO long, there was no source for news on developments in practice management and document assembly.&amp;nbsp; And yet, several vendors has started getting savvy about social marketing.&amp;nbsp; For example, Exari and ContractExpress have launched blogs and twitter feeds of news and development.&amp;nbsp; And so, rather than hunting everywhere for developments, I created a page for myself to track these latest &#8220;feeds&#8221; and then set it up for you to enjoy.&amp;nbsp; Come take a look; bookmark the site, and come back regularly.&amp;nbsp; If there are OTHER feeds you want to see, please suggest it.&amp;nbsp; Best of all, check out the new technology.&amp;nbsp; This is the first consultant website that you can &#8220;PERSONALIZE&#8221;. Yeah, you can reorder the feeds, change the priorities, and move it around to suit YOUR technology needs.</description>
      <dc:subject>Case Management, Document Assembly, GhostFill, HotDocs, Time Matters</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very excited about the site.&nbsp; It saves me from having to hunt around for news.&nbsp; At the moment, it is limited to &#8220;public feeds&#8221;.&nbsp; There are actually several vendors that have feeds that require a LOGIN to get access to their blog.&nbsp; I can configure the website to access those feeds, but only with permission.&nbsp; If you want me to add your business feed, and it is behind a login, please send me an email granting permission, along with an appropriate login to see it.&nbsp; 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T06:54:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Website Redesign</title>
      <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php/weblog/website_redesign/</link>
      <description>Every other year I assess our firm&#8217;s web&#45;presence and look at the state of technology.&amp;nbsp; My goal is to build a website that is informative, describes the products we support, and gives useful comparative and illustrative information about those products. Two years ago my interests were wide ranging, but the core of our business was HotDocs, GhostFill and Time Matters.&amp;nbsp; Since that time, our skill set and product offerings have expanded, as well as our staff.&amp;nbsp; We now have significant programming and database management capabilities by virtue of the inclusion of Steve Stockstill and Marc Wexler in our virtual offerings, and have engaged our partner Holly Humphreys in several billing engagements.&amp;nbsp; 


We have entered into the web&#45;development business with a new offering coming out in the 4th quarter through our partner businesswebsitedesigners.com.au that addresses the needs of lawyers interested in both social media and document automation. We have diversified our offerings of practice management solutions to include AdvologixPM and Amicus Attorney Premium Edition.&amp;nbsp; We have built solutions with Exari document assembly and DealBuilder, now offered on a SaaS model as ContractExpress.&amp;nbsp; And we have partnered with NetDocuments to provide cloud&#45;based document management.&amp;nbsp; And so, our website, as comprehensive as it is, is hopelessly out of date.</description>
      <dc:subject>Case Management, Collaboration, DealBuilder, Soapbox</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We plan to be dividing our website along product lines, with offerings describing in detail each product we support and our twist as to which of you they will best serve.&nbsp; We will also be providing some feature comparisons between competing products to help you decide which features are important to you.&nbsp; This will not happen overnight, but will be a work in progress.&nbsp; Also, we will be offering this blog feed, alongside the feeds of vendors and opinion leaders in a new website (more on that at a later time).&nbsp;  
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-03-03T04:33:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Credenza, Houdini, AdvologixPM, RocketMatter, Clio, TimeMatters 10 &amp;amp; Amicus 2010</title>
      <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php/weblog/credenza_houdini_advologixpm_rocketmatter_clio_timematters_10_amicus_2010/</link>
      <description>Wow!!!!! The marketplace for practice management software has exploded this year.&amp;nbsp; They must have added something to the water that programmers drink (they do drink , don&#8217;t they?).&amp;nbsp; 


Well, yesterday, Gavel &amp;amp; Gown released Credenza (Click for more info).&amp;nbsp; Now you can have your Outlook and your case management; no synchronization, no exchange.&amp;nbsp; Rather, you now have FILES within Outlook.&amp;nbsp; A $9.95/month subscription is the cost.


Meanwhile, I am currently reviewing HoudiESQ. This system is a web&#45;based practice management system designed by Frank Rivera (who architected Time Matters World Edition). It is offered on either a SAAS (Software as Service) or self&#45;hosted basis. What is different is that it entirely redesigns and rethinks the interface for a practice management system.&amp;nbsp; Stay tuned for my review in Technolawyer later this month.


Not to be outdone, LexisNexis has released Time Matters 10 (on an all&#45;SQL platform)   Apart from major improvements in stability and access speed, the system includes Desktop Extensions.&amp;nbsp; These widgets give you a window into Time Matters on your desktop and could change entirely the way you work with your practice management system.


Gavel &amp;amp; Gown, with the release of Amicus 2010 Premium Edition, has produced a solid, stable product.&amp;nbsp; While continuing its focus on &#8220;separate offices&#8221;, the Premium Edition, centralizes the data on a single SQL Server (full SQL Server 2008 Standard is included with the license) and added extensive customization in the form of custom pages and custom records


On the SAAS front, RocketMatters, Clio and newcomer AdvologixPM are coming into their own.&amp;nbsp; Each have been progressively adding features to fill out the requirements of a robust practice management system.&amp;nbsp; Clio and RocketMatter have expanded their billing and trust accounting features. AdvologixPM, with its support for extensive customization, has released a new document automation module that lets you launch full document packages, populated with data from the Force.com platform.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is going on?&nbsp; For several years nothing happened in Practice Management.&nbsp; Many vendors &#8220;treaded water&#8221;.&nbsp; Some vendors exited.&nbsp; Few new players entered the market.&nbsp; And existing products pretty much stayed the same. There was no excitement, no ferment.&nbsp; Something is clearly happening.&nbsp; And it may not be good for established vendors unless they respond to the new environment and try to generate buzz and excitement about their products.&nbsp; The SAAS products are looking at a complete redesign of the way practice management is done (anywhere, anytime, any platform) that reflects the new business reality.&nbsp; The SAAS products also are looking at entirely new interfaces and windows into your practice data.
</p>
<p>
How can the SAAS developers do it?&nbsp; There are two answers.&nbsp; First, the SAAS developers control the software and the hardware.&nbsp; In a hosted environment, the developer can make instant improvements.&nbsp; There is no need to wait for the &#8220;long-tail&#8221; of users to upgrade; no need to support multiple platforms, legacy software and legacy hardware.&nbsp; The host is the platform.&nbsp; And that makes the SAAS developers much more nimble.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
The second reason, perhaps, is more significant.&nbsp; And that is the pricing model.&nbsp; SAAS is &#8220;cheap&#8221; on the start-up, and expensive in the long run.&nbsp; It is very easy and cheap to get started with Credenza, RocketMatter, Clio and AdvologixPM.&nbsp; Once you have signed on, you will keep paying so long as you use the platform.&nbsp; That means that there will be ever-increasing revenue for the SAAS developer so long as it continues to innovate; with the more innovation leading to more sales, and further increases in revenue. This is a &#8220;win-win&#8221; situation.&nbsp; The SAAS developer wins by the &#8220;monthly&#8221; vote by the end-user paying their fee.&nbsp; The user wins by having that vote courted with constant innovation.&nbsp; By contrast, the up-front software sale with nominal maintenance produces a &#8220;disincentive&#8221; to constant innovation; once you reach market saturation in your segment, the revenue actually decreases.&nbsp; 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-02-12T13:09:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Dcoument Assembly on the Move &#45; Contract Express</title>
      <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php/weblog/dcoument_assembly_on_the_move_contract_express/</link>
      <description>I have never been more optimistic about the future of document assembly than today. After years of retrenchment and stagnation, the market is full of new energy and ferment.&amp;nbsp; HotDocs is under new management, but it is not clear what direction it will be taking.&amp;nbsp; On the desktop, XpressDox has been launched by key developers formerly of Korbitec, developers of GhostFill. At $150/user, a free full&#45;functioning trial downloads, a full powered syntax markup that requires NO component file and automatically determines relevance, there is some real new energy on the desktop level.&amp;nbsp; 


On the server level, it is even more exciting.&amp;nbsp; Most document assembly server systems started at $25,000 and then went up into the statosphere.&amp;nbsp; At those prices, document assembly servers were the exclusive domain of large corporations and large firms, or used as publishing platforms.&amp;nbsp; The software, from Exari, Business&#45;Integrity, and LexisNexis was very powerful, but often required, in addition to cost extensive domain knowledge in configuring and hardening a web&#45;server, beefy hardware requirement, and large bandwidth.&amp;nbsp; Changes in management at HotDocs and Exari, as well as changes in direction at Business&#45;Integrity could soon change that equation.&amp;nbsp; 


The first out of the gate with a solution for the &#8220;uncommon attorney&#8221; and little guy is Business Integrity.&amp;nbsp; It has taken its powerful DealBuilder document assembly and relevance engine and rebranded, repackaged, and re&#45;engineered it to function in the CLOUD on a hosted SAAS basis.&amp;nbsp; With the release of ContractExpress this week, Business Integrity, has thrown down the gauntlet.&amp;nbsp; For $195/month per user, you can now have world&#45;class document assembly on the web.&amp;nbsp; And, if you have never seen ContractExpress in action, it redefines document assembly in power and ease of use.</description>
      <dc:subject>DealBuilder, Document Assembly, Articles, HotDocs, Templates</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><b>Disclosure:</b>  I am an independent document assembly specialist.&nbsp; That said.&nbsp; I am in the business of building document assembly systems.&nbsp; In the process, I resell software and do collect (depending on vendor arrangements) commissions on those sales.&nbsp; I currently am a partner with Business Integrity, and thus, if I am engaged to do consulting using ContractExpress, and my client signs up for ContractExpress, I will get a commission</p></blockquote>
<p>
Back to ContractExpress.&nbsp; Several years ago I reviewed DealBuilder for Technolawyer.&nbsp; A copy of that review is on my website and LinkedIn profile.&nbsp; Two years ago, I previewed a version of DealBuilder in London during a trip there, the version that has become ContractExpress.&nbsp; ContractExpress is a fully powered system that supports all you would expect from a document assembly engine.&nbsp; What is exciting about ConractExpress is that the power is &#8220;hidden&#8221; behind a vastly simplified interface.&nbsp; The interface just works.&nbsp; It allows incredibly rapid template development.&nbsp; Between the ContractExpress &#8220;ribbon&#8221; in Word 2007 and the task panel list of components, you can do all your development without ever leaving your word processor.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-02-06T15:17:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Demise of D3 &#45; Custom Tags vs. Markup Language</title>
      <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php/weblog/demise_of_d3_custom_tags_vs_markup_language/</link>
      <description>D3 from Microsystems has flown under the radar for years.&amp;nbsp; I mentioned it in a Technolawyer review of document assembly products several years ago.&amp;nbsp; It was a powerful &#8220;clause&#45;based&#8221; system that enabled and integrated well with advanced Microsoft products, included Exchange Server and SQL Server.&amp;nbsp; It was sold by Microsystems out of Chicago and was popular with large firms looking to extend the power of macro&#45;suite products without leaving the Microsoft environment.&amp;nbsp; The product was in fact embedded in a task panel in Microsoft Word.&amp;nbsp; Well, as you can see in the release below, copied from the Microsystems web&#45;site, a recent change in MS Word has rendered the product inoperable, and Microsystems is withdrawing D3 from the market.&amp;nbsp; The reason, custom XML tags that a recent Microsoft product change (required by an anti&#45;trust settlement with the European Union regulators) removed from the product, on which D3 depends.&amp;nbsp; This is not the first time that changed by a word&#45;processing vendor caused document assembly products to &#8220;die&#8221;.&amp;nbsp; WordPerfect was notorious in earlier versions from regularly updating its macro language, rending macro&#45;based suites based on one version inoperable on upgrade.</description>
      <dc:subject>DealBuilder, Document Assembly, Articles, GhostFill, HotDocs</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<b>Microsoft Removes Custom XML Code from Office: D3 and Legal TemplatesPlus Discontinued</b>
</p>
<p>
Downers Grove, IL – January 27, 2010 Microsystems announced it will discontinue development of D3 and Legal TemplatesPlus as a result of Microsoft&#8217;s decision to remove Custom XML code from Office. Microsoft made this decision following the ruling from the i4i infringement lawsuit.&nbsp; DocXtools, Microsystems&#8217; core product, is not affected by this decision.
</p>
<p>
Although D3 and Legal TemplatesPlus offered distinct competitive advantages and benefited from strong client demand and adoption, a significant portion of the functionality in both products was rendered inoperable in versions of Microsoft Office sold after January 10, 2010.
</p>
<p>
Microsystems evaluated various alternatives including redeveloping both products, but determined a feature equivalency could not be attained with the technologies and methodologies available today and the development work would likely result in an overall inferior solution for customers. In addition, it would require that little if any resources could be used to focus on our core product, DocXtools. Furthermore, no acceptable transition between existing D3 and Legal TemplatesPlus solutions and any new technology exists. This result would have imposed considerable migration issues on our customers.
</p>
<p>
Last year, DocXtools accounted for over 85% of Microsystems revenue. In contrast, licenses of D3 and Legal TemplatesPlus accounted for approximately 10% of revenue. As a result of these changes, development, sales and support staff related to D3 and Legal TemplatesPlus were reduced. Moving forward, DocXtools is supported by 45 people; 35 of those positions are comprised of development, support and document experts.
</p>
<p>
&#8220;Certainly we are disappointed about the difficult decision we had to make, but we are also energized by the ongoing success of DocXtools, a product that has been in the market for 11 years. In 2009, we added many new DocXtools customers and 93 customers entered into new or extended license agreements. In 2010 we expect to continue to grow our 249 firm install base as more organizations strive to improve efficiency and client service by deploying new DocXtools functionality out to lawyers and secretaries.&#8221; said Tom O&#8217;Sullivan, Chief Executive Officer.
<br />
</p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-02-03T23:31:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Sales vs Consulting &#45; The Cost of Independence</title>
      <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php/weblog/sales_vs_consulting/</link>
      <description>What is the role of the &#8220;independent consultant&#8221;?&amp;nbsp; And should the &#8220;independent consultant&#8221; be allowed to benefit from a &#8220;sale&#8221; based on his/her independent recommendation?&amp;nbsp; Software vendors with &#8220;reseller&#8221; programs have always wanted a &#8220;free sales force&#8221; of consultants who offer their software &#8220;exclusively&#8221;; no salary, no benefits, no costs. These consultants are &#8220;paid&#8221; by the vendor in the form of commissions on sales (often narrowly defined) or referral fees and access to NFR copies of the software.&amp;nbsp; And yet, the questions arises, when one vendor demands exclusivity, what is the &#8220;price&#8221; for independence.&amp;nbsp; This article looks at the price and the benefits of an in independent non&#45;exclusive consulting program to clients.&amp;nbsp; Some of the arguments are obvious, but they bear restating.</description>
      <dc:subject>Soapbox</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Independent consultants are into sales; but they are selling expertise, implementation and training, as well as product.&nbsp; There are some consultants who are paid to just make recommendations and then leave.&nbsp; In the document assembly space, consultants build solutions for their clients.&nbsp; In doing so they often choose the most powerful and most cost-effective solution for their clients that is available within their client&#8217;s budget.&nbsp; Their primary loyalty is, has been, and should be, to their clients.&nbsp; The success of a consultant is measured in the increased productivity of their clients (real money to their bottom line) and the fact that clients will return to a good consultant to expand, extend and enhance a document assembly system; taking it to the next level. 
</p>
<p>
A good programmer, like a good document consultant is not conversant in a single language. Who ever heard of a &#8220;good&#8221; Visual Basic programmer, who was not also conversant in C##, .NET, and PHP?&nbsp; Limiting yourself to a single language for solutions will not result in a good fit.&nbsp; Many solutions require a blending of languages, as when I blend a VB macro into a document assembly solution, or extend the help text in a web-based interview with javascript rules, even with dynamic prompts and option sets that call on custom functions outside the core document assembly engine.&nbsp; Moreover, the expertise and approaches in one language are transferable to other languages.&nbsp; Syntax and variable naming conventions that come from an object-oriented programming language like GhostFill can be adapted to HotDocs, Exari, DealBuilder/ContractExpress, and XpressDox.&nbsp; 
</p>
<p>
The same document assembly syntax naming conventions can be used to manage merge templates for grabbing data out of Time Matters, Amicus Attorney and Advologix.&nbsp; Only by exposing yourself to all these platforms can a consultant develop the breadth of knowledge and approaches to best serve clients.&nbsp; There is real benefit to the client from this broad-based knowledge.&nbsp; Regardless of the platform ultimately chosen, a &#8220;liberal arts&#8221; educated program will be able to build a powerful solution, exploiting the full power of the chosen platform.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-02-03T22:31:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Sixth Sense Device &#45; Out of the Box Computing</title>
      <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php/weblog/sixth_sense_device_out_of_the_box_computing/</link>
      <description>Imagine a world where the &#8220;digital world&#8221; merged with the &#8220;physical world&#8221;.&amp;nbsp; Combine a mini&#45;lcd projector, a ccd camera, a cell phone, and a micro&#45;processor in a device the size of an iTouch.&amp;nbsp; And then add software that support &#8220;multi&#45;touch gestures&#8221;.&amp;nbsp; What you get is the vision of Pranav Mistry (a MIT professor) for what he calls a &#8220;sixth sense&#8221; device.&amp;nbsp; Check out the video presentation on TED.com (or click on the link below in the article).&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Soapbox</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vision of Pranav is mind blowing.&nbsp; Imagine projecting a number pad on your hand and dialing your phone with your fingers.&nbsp; Imagine converting a blank piece of paper into a gaming device.&nbsp; What he has done is expand the vision and role of computers beyond the &#8220;devices&#8221; into something that is ubiquitous and integrated into the real world.
</p>
<p>
The implications of his breakthroughs, and whether they are &#8220;ready for market&#8221; can be debated. But you need to see these videos to regain the &#8220;gee wiz&#8221; about computers. He gives new meaning to &#8220;gestures&#8221;.&nbsp; Just as the invention of the mouse and the GUI (graphical user interface) revolutionized computing in the last 3 decades, so to will the gesture technology put into concrete form by Pranav revolutionize computing in the next fee decades.&nbsp; Check it out.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-12-23T19:32:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Inbox backwards &#45; XOBONI &#45; The Ultimate Exchange Addon</title>
      <link>http://bashasys.info/index.php/weblog/inbox_backwards_xoboni_the_ultimate_exchange_addon/</link>
      <description>If you use OUTLOOK or EXCHANGE, you must get XOBNI.&amp;nbsp; That is inbox backwards.&amp;nbsp; And it works that way.&amp;nbsp; It turns your inbox upside down.&amp;nbsp; From a morass of emails and other crap, XOBNI brings order.&amp;nbsp; And it does this without you providing any organizing principle.&amp;nbsp; No need for folders and rules etc.&amp;nbsp; Rather, there is a simple search box.&amp;nbsp; It indexes your inbox.&amp;nbsp; It creates profiles of all your senders and recipients.&amp;nbsp; It pulls their data automatically from LinkedIn, Twitter, Hoovers, Facebook and other social networking services.&amp;nbsp; It shows the relationships between that person and ALL your other contacts.&amp;nbsp; It takes your emails and threads them together in conversations (remember GMAIL).&amp;nbsp; And it exposes and makes searchable ALL attached documents.</description>
      <dc:subject>Soapbox</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is the cost ... well FREE.&nbsp; The free version should be adequate for most people.&nbsp; For $35 you get a little more.&nbsp; If you are looking for a needle in a haystack, XOBNI is your metal detector.&nbsp; It sorts the chaff and out comes the needle.&nbsp; Want to know who knows whom.&nbsp; Use this handy little sidebar.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-12-03T19:52:01-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>